Best Ad Formats for Website Monetization in 2025
Not all ad formats are created equal. The difference between a publisher earning $2 RPM and $12 RPM often comes down to which formats they're running and where.
Read moreSticky ads offer consistency. In-content ads offer scale. The truth is you need both — but the ratio depends on your traffic behavior, content type, and CPM goals. Here's the full breakdown.
Click Dudes Editorial Team
Click Dudes helps publishers maximize revenue through AI-powered monetization, premium demand access, and advanced optimization strategies.
Ad placement is one of the highest-leverage variables in publisher monetization — and few decisions matter more than choosing between sticky formats and in-content units. Each has distinct CPM profiles, viewability characteristics, and UX implications. Understanding the trade-offs lets you build a format stack that maximizes revenue without sacrificing the user experience that keeps readers returning.
Sticky ads (also called anchored or fixed-position ads) remain visible in the viewport as the user scrolls. Common implementations: a 320×50 or 728×90 banner anchored to the bottom of the screen, a sticky sidebar MREC (300×250) that follows the user down a long article, or a sticky header leaderboard. Because they remain in view, viewability scores are consistently high — often 80–95%.
In-content ads (also called in-article ads) are injected within the body of the content at regular intervals — typically every 3–5 paragraphs. They appear and disappear from the viewport as the user scrolls. Viewability varies by position: the first in-content unit after the first paragraph routinely scores 65–75%, while units deep in the article may score 30–45%.
Sticky ads typically earn $2–$8 CPM on desktop and $1.50–$5 CPM on mobile depending on vertical and geography. In-content ads show more variance: the first unit often earns $2–$6 CPM while units 4+ deep earn $0.60–$2 CPM. The blended in-content CPM tends to land at $1.50–$3.50 when averaged across all positions.
Sticky ads win decisively here. Anchored bottom banners achieve 80–95% viewability by design — they are always in view. The first in-content unit typically achieves 60–75% viewability. Units further down the page drop to 35–50%. This viewability gap explains why sticky units often command higher CPMs per impression despite sometimes lower click-through rates.
In-content ads tend to have higher CTR (0.15–0.45%) because they appear within the reading flow where users are engaged. Sticky ads, especially persistent bottom banners, often have lower CTR (0.05–0.15%) because users adapt to their presence quickly — banner blindness for persistent elements is real. However, CPM campaigns (which dominate programmatic) don't reward CTR, so this matters less in modern publisher stacks.
Sticky ads that cover too much screen real estate (over 15% on mobile) trigger Google's Better Ads Standards violations — which can result in Chrome's ad filtering activating on your site. A 320×50 at the bottom of a mobile screen uses under 8% of viewport and is broadly acceptable. In-content ads that interrupt reading flow too frequently (every 2 paragraphs or less) generate negative user feedback and higher bounce rates.
In-content ads are highly effective here because users scroll deeply through the content. A well-paced 3–4 in-content units per article can generate significant revenue without disrupting reading. Pair with one sticky sidebar MREC on desktop and a sticky bottom banner on mobile for a strong format stack.
In-content ads have limited opportunity — there may only be space for 1–2 before the content ends. Sticky formats are more effective here, ensuring visibility throughout the short session. A sticky top or bottom banner captures the user's full session duration.
Pages centered on video players should prioritize pre-roll and mid-roll video ads (highest CPM) over display. Use sticky display as a complement — a 300×250 beside the player that persists after playback. In-content display below video typically earns moderate CPMs but adds revenue diversity.
News readers have high scroll velocity — they read fast and leave. Sticky banners capture these high-speed sessions better than in-content units that might not load before the user leaves. Above-fold in-content units (first paragraph) still earn well; below-fold units perform poorly on news content.
The highest-revenue publishers don't choose between sticky and in-content — they use both strategically. A proven format stack for long-form content sites:
The only way to know what works for your audience is testing. Run 2-week A/B tests varying: sticky placement position (bottom vs. sidebar), in-content frequency (every 3 vs. every 5 paragraphs), and ad unit sizes. Measure RPM (revenue per 1,000 pageviews) rather than CPM alone — it accounts for impression volume differences between variants.
Not all ad formats are created equal. The difference between a publisher earning $2 RPM and $12 RPM often comes down to which formats they're running and where.
Read moreAdvertisers pay up to 3x more for viewable impressions. Yet most publishers don't realize their CPMs are suppressed by placement decisions made years ago. Here's how viewability works and what to do about it.
Read more